7
Mehdi akbari; Fariborz Abbasi; Abolfazl Nasseri; Afshin Gomrokchi; mostafa goodarzi; Amir Eslami; masoud Farzamnia; r alimohammadi; Nader Kouhi Chellehkaran; Reza Bahramloo; Ali Ghadami Firouzabadi; seyed abolghassem Haghayeghi moghaddam; Ardalan Zolfagharan; Jamal Ahmadaali; Mohamad Abasi; Hamid Riahi; Mohammad Mehdi Nakhjavanimoghaddam
Abstract
In this study, volume of irrigation water, water productivity, and yield of alfalfa were measured in 300 farms in Zanjan, Fars, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Hamedan, East Azerbaijan, Semnan, Khorasan-Razavi, Isfahan, West Azerbaijan, Central, Qazvin and Kerman provinces under farmers management and surface ...
Read More
In this study, volume of irrigation water, water productivity, and yield of alfalfa were measured in 300 farms in Zanjan, Fars, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Hamedan, East Azerbaijan, Semnan, Khorasan-Razavi, Isfahan, West Azerbaijan, Central, Qazvin and Kerman provinces under farmers management and surface and sprinkler irrigation, various water sources, different water salinities, soil conditions, and varieties, during the growing season of 2018-2019. The results showed that the difference between average volumes of water applied by farmers, yield, and water productivity, in the studied sites were significant at 1% probability level. The average amount of applied water by farmers was 8502, 8901, 9226, 9459, 11481, 12796, 14311, 14821, 15198, 15916, 18351 and 23920 m3/ha, respectively, and the average was 13284 m3/ha. The dry yield of alfalfa varied from 2500 to 30000 kg/ha with an average of 13841 kg/ha. Irrigation water productivity varied from 0.2 to 4.5 and its average was 1.28 kg/m3. The average irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity for alfalfa was 1.19 kg/m3. The results showed that the average applied water and alfalfa yield in surface and sprinkler irrigation methods were 15076 and 10653 m3/ha, respectively, (p<1%). These results showed that in sprinkler irrigation method, applied water was 30% less and irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity was 41% higher. Accordingly, in order to reduce the volume of irrigation water and improve alfalfa water productivity, it is recommended to use sprinkler method in suitable climatic conditions where irrigation water is of good quality and the technical criteria of design, implementation, operation, and economic considerations are met.
7
Mehdi Akbari; Fariborz Abbasi; Abolazal Nasseri; Mohammad Ali Shahrokhnia; Mohammad Khorramian; Masoud Farzamnia; majid keramati targhi; Azarakhs Azizi; Mohamad Abasi; Eshag Zare; Hasan Khosravi; Esmaeil Moghbeli; Mohammad Mehdi Nakhjavanimoghaddam; Nader Abbasi; Javad Baghani
Abstract
This project was implemented with the aim of measuring water applied to onion under farmers’ management in 190 selected sites at the production hubs of onion in Iran including Azarbaijan Sharghi, Isfahan, Khusestan, Zanjan, Kerman, Fars, Khorasan Razavi, Khorasan Shomali, and Hormozgan provinces. ...
Read More
This project was implemented with the aim of measuring water applied to onion under farmers’ management in 190 selected sites at the production hubs of onion in Iran including Azarbaijan Sharghi, Isfahan, Khusestan, Zanjan, Kerman, Fars, Khorasan Razavi, Khorasan Shomali, and Hormozgan provinces. According to the results, differences between the average volumes of irrigation water in those provinces, different irrigation methods, various sources and salinities of irrigation water and soil, and different onion varieties were significant (p<1%), during the growing season of 2020-2021. The average amount of applied water by farmers in those provinces was 9502, 13273, 9740, 16588, 9618, 13880, 11998, 8438 and 7057 m3/ha, respectively, with the weighted average of 10823 m3/ha. The onion yield in selected sites, varied from 20000 to 90000 kg/ha, with an average of 49980 kg/ha. The measured values were compared with the net irrigation water requirement estimated by the FAO Penman-Monteith method and with the National Water Document values. The results showed that the differences between average volumes of applied water by farmers, yield and irrigation water productivity, and irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity in the selected sites were significant at 5% probability level. Irrigation water productivity varied from 3.13 to 6.30 kg/m3 and its average was 4.93 kg/m3. The average irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity for onion in Iran was 4.50 kg/m3. The average net irrigation water requirement in the study areas by the Penman-Monteith method and the National Water Document were 8834 and 6972 m3/ha, respectively. These results showed that the average applied water in surface, sprinkler, and drip irrigation methods were 11453, 12740 and 10317 m3/ha, respectively, with significant (p<5%) difference. These results showed that in drip irrigation method, applied water was 10% lesser while irrigation water plus effective rainfall productivity was 35% higher. Transplanting seedling compared to direct seeding caused 14.7% reduction in applied water and 16.7% increase in water productivity. According to the results of this study, drip irrigation and transplanting method for onion fields is recommended.
Mohammad Mehdi Nakhjavanimoghaddam; b gh; gh z
Abstract
Recently, the main challenge of agricultural sector is improvement of crop water productivity (CWP). In Iran, unfortunately up to now, determination and analysis of water productivity indicators in agricultural sector has not been considered seriously, which has led to the uncertainty of proper water ...
Read More
Recently, the main challenge of agricultural sector is improvement of crop water productivity (CWP). In Iran, unfortunately up to now, determination and analysis of water productivity indicators in agricultural sector has not been considered seriously, which has led to the uncertainty of proper water consumption in agriculture. This study was aimed to evaluate wheat water productivity under different irrigation managements in Iran and determine the suitable irrigation depth for wheat in situation of water resource limitations. Based on the experiments conducted in eight research stations located in different regions of the country during 1998-2012 for wheat, it was found that the range of CWP was 0.3-1.5 kg m-3 which was wider than that reported earlier by the FAO, i.e. 0.8-1.0 kg m-3. Nevertheless, it is in the range proposed by Zwart and Bastiaanssen in 13 countries from five different continents. The wide ranges of CWP indicate tremendous opportunities for increasing the agricultural productions with less water. The maximum measured wheat water productivity (CWPI) for irrigation water alone and for irrigation+ effective rainfall (CWPI+Re) was 2.1 and 1.5 kg m-3, respectively, in Karaj region, where drip irrigation and deficit irrigation management were applied. Also, the minimum measured wheat CWPI and CWPI+Re was observed in Kerman region under surface irrigation. The maximum measured wheat CWPI and CWPI+Re in Mashhad region was 1.9 and 1.5 kg m-3, respectively, under deficit irrigation management. The results showed that wheat CWPI and CWPI+Re of 1.6 and 1.1 kg m-3 could be considered as the optimum levels in cropping system of Mashhad region. The depths of irrigation water alone and total applied water (irrigation +effective rainfall) for optimum level of wheat CWP under deficit irrigation management were 300 and 420 mm, respectively.
M N; B GH; K D; A A; H D; A T
Abstract
In order to evaluate the role of a limited irrigation and agronomic management scenarios on improving yield and rain water productivity (WP) of rainfed wheat, a field study was conducted at multiple farms of Honam (Lorestan Province) in the upper Karkheh River Basin (KRB), Iran. The calibrated and validated ...
Read More
In order to evaluate the role of a limited irrigation and agronomic management scenarios on improving yield and rain water productivity (WP) of rainfed wheat, a field study was conducted at multiple farms of Honam (Lorestan Province) in the upper Karkheh River Basin (KRB), Iran. The calibrated and validated AquaCrop model was used to define the best management scenario in order to enhance yield and WP of rainfed wheat in upper KRB in 2013-2014. In the next step, the best management scenarios were carried out in three research fields of rainfed wheat in 2014-2015. In field experiments, the treatments included two main management (traditional and advanced management) and two levels of limited irrigation (rainfed, single irrigation of 60 mm at spring time). According to the best scenario of AquaCrop model, spring single irrigation with constant depth of 60 mm was applied at three times (the first, middle and end of flowering period). The result shows that under rainfed conditions, by using the advanced management, rain water productivity of wheat increased by 36% as compared to traditional management. The results of this study showed that a single irrigation application at spring time (during flowering stage) increased the average total water productivity of wheat to 0.70 kg m-3, an increase of 74% as compared to the traditional management. The optimum program was obtained by a combination of advanced agronomic management package with single irrigation of 60 mm at the middle of flowering stage, which increased yield and WP of rainfed wheat to 176% and 134%, respectively, as compared to traditional management. Results of field experiments were in good agreement with the proposed scenarios by AquaCrop model.